Spread the word » Facebook Twitter
logo and head

Big Coal giant Millennium wants to build America's largest coal-export terminal right next to the Columbia River in Washington State. But scientists warn that would have dire consequences for land, water and air quality, not to mention our climate. The Army Corps of Engineers just rejected another coal terminal nearby, so now is the perfect time to act. Click here to tell the Army Corps to reject coal exports in Longview WA.


Coal is in a death spiral right now. Whether it's another Bureau of Labor Statistics report indicating a drop coal jobs,1 or coal companies filing for bankruptcy2 the writing is on the wall -- we're transitioning from coal and other fossil fuels by demanding a fossil fuel free future. But don't tell that to Big Coal corporation Millennium Bulk Terminals Longview (Longview). They're ignoring trying to defy the economics, the news and the climate by building a coal export-terminal along the Columbia River in Washington. But they don't just want to build any terminal, they want to build the biggest one in the United States.

If the Longview project is approved, it could send 44 million tons of coal to Asia every year.3 That would be the equivalent of adding 600,000 new cars to the road each year. And when you account for operations and all the coal that would be burned in Asia, we're talking an increase of more than 2.5 million metric tons of global warming pollution per year.

There's really only one way to characterize such a dirty proposal: Climate Killer. That's why scientists from the Washington Department of Ecology determined that this project would result in significant impacts to the environment.4 The scientists have spoken and it's time for our government to start listening. Click here to tell the Army Corps of Engineers to reject this climate killing COALamity.

The good news is that the Army Corps have demonstrated their willingness to reject a coal terminals if they're too polluting or dangerous. Just this week, they rejected a permit for a similar facility in northern Washington.And it was a particularly righteous victory because they cited respect for the Lummi Nation's fishing rights as the primary reason for blocking the facility. But just because Army Corps stopped coal once, doesn't mean we can expect them to do the same thing again.

This is our chance to win another victory against fossil fuels during the Break Free week of direct actions across the globe that demand we #KeepItInTheGround. We have to act fast though, our coalition of Coal-Capping activists is aiming to get 300,000 comments opposing the Longview project before the June 13 deadline. Click here to help us reach our goal by saying NO to coal.

Thanks for sounding off,

Anthony and the Environmental Action Keep It In the Ground Crew 

1. Jeffery, Terrance P. U.S. Has Lost 191,000 Mining Industry Jobs Since September 2014. CNSNews.com. May 6, 2016.

2. Shah, Jigar. Coal Industry "Up and Smoke" and it's Blaming Everyone But Itself. Huffington Post. April 18, 2016.

3. Profita, Cassandra. Environmental Impacts Linked to Columbia River Coal Project. KUOW.org. April 29, 2016.

4. Le, Foung. Study Says Coal-Export Terminal Could Have Significant Imacts. Casper Star Tribune. April 29, 2016.

5. Wohlfeil, Samantha. Army Corps Rejects Permit for Coal Terminal at Cherry Point. The Bellingham Herald. May 9, 2016.


You can support our work today by making a secure online contribution.

Click here to unsubscribe